Taking Measurements

Barely a fashion week goes by now without a tech name on the guest list, nor does a product launch happen without a fashion name attached to it. Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses campaign fronted by Kylie Jenner went viral earlier this year, for better or worse, underlining how far tech companies will now go to borrow fashion star power.

In February, Mark Zuckerberg featured in the front row of Prada’s Milan show, fuelling speculation of a partnership between Meta and Prada or Miu Miu built on Meta’s existing relationship with EssilorLuxottica, the eyewear giant. In May, Google, Samsung and Gentle Monster previewed a joint line of Gemini-powered smart glasses, due to launch this autumn, pairing Gentle Monster’s design credibility with Samsung’s hardware and Google’s AI. Departing from glasses, Ralph Lauren’s 25-year partnership with Microsoft recently produced “Ask Ralph”, an AI styling assistant built on Azure OpenAI. Ralph Lauren has also teamed up with Epic Games to bring a digital-first collection featuring the Polo Pony into the Fortnite shop, extending the brand’s reach into gaming.

The direction of travel is clear: what used to be one-off sponsorships are increasingly formalised, multi-year commercial relationships. For fashion brands facing tariff turbulence, softer consumer spending and the disruptive expansion of AI, a tech partner offers a shortcut to innovation, cost savings and renewed relevance. For tech companies, a fashion partner offers design credibility and a route into an oversaturated consumer market.

Below is a guide to how these deals are structured, what each side is really bargaining for, and the clauses worth double-checking from a legal standpoint before signing off.

Cutting the Pattern

Most fashion/tech tie-ups fall into one of four shapes, though many combine elements of more than one.

1. Co-branded products – A single product or capsule carrying both names, without a long-term structural relationship. Examples include Diesel’s smart ring with Ultrahuman, and the Apple Watch Hermès, which has run continuously since its 2014 launch
2. Formalised partnerships – Deeper integration such as shared creative direction or a “fused studio” model, for example Samuel Ross’s SR_A working inside WHOOP on a customised band collection, or (more rarely) board-level governance links
3. Equity investment – One party takes a financial stake in the other, as with SR_A’s investment in WHOOP, or Meta’s investment in EssilorLuxottica
4. Licensing – A label or designer licences the IP in its name and/or designs, for use on specific products. The traditional licensing structure continues to work well in the fashion/tech space and is often used for the creation of co-branded products/strategic partnerships

Tailored Fit: What each side is bargaining for

Fashion brands are typically chasing innovation, cost efficiency, new consumer touchpoints and engagement with AI to relay to investors and consumers. Tech companies are typically chasing design legitimacy, cultural relevance and a route to standing out in a crowded consumer hardware or software market. Once both sides are in the room, the following will be key negotiation points:

• Revenue and profit sharing between the parties
• IP ownership, especially concerning co-developed designs, data models and any new brand assets
• Data rights, covering who owns and can use consumer data generated by the partnership
• Exclusivity, including category and competitor carve-outs on both sides
• Termination and division of assets / rights when the partnership ends
• Research and development cost allocation where the collaboration involves genuine joint development
• Licensing and royalty rates for use of each party’s branding
• Allocation of liability exposure and related indemnities
• Governing law and dispute resolution particularly in respect of cross-border collaborations

A Potential Snag

None of the above works if the underlying commercial logic is not aligned. A fashion brand chasing a quick marketing moment and a tech company aiming for a multi-year platform relationship will need to negotiate this gap down early, ideally before terms are drafted. The scale of investment involved (Meta’s stake in EssilorLuxottica, Ralph Lauren and Microsoft’s quarter-century relationship) tends to correlate with how formal, and how heavily negotiated, the governance and IP provisions need to be.

Beyond the Drop: Tech as back-office tailor

Fashion/tech collaborations do not always involve a consumer-facing launch. Plenty of value is in quieter, process-facing partnerships that seek to improve business in other ways:

• Efficiency and circularity: H&M’s joint venture with recycling group Remondis, Looper Textile Co., pairs a fashion retailer with process and materials expertise to industrialise textile recycling. Coach-parent Tapestry has partnered with Adobe to train custom Firefly models on its own proprietary designs, while Shein has turned its in-house Xcelerator platform into a service it now offers to other brands
• Anticipating the next gap in the market: SPREEAI, an AI-powered virtual try-on company, partnered with designer Sergio Hudson on its first direct-to-consumer luxury collaboration, letting customers try on garments online with accurate fit and personalisation

The Final Stitch

Fashion/tech collaborations are no longer a novelty, they are becoming a standard way to grow brands on both sides. The companies getting the most out of them are the ones treating the commercial and legal foundation with the same seriousness as the creative pitch: agreeing structure, IP ownership, data rights and exit terms before any product drops.

Please do get in touch if you have or are exploring a fashion/tech partnership and would like to discuss more.

Find out more about our expertise in Corporate and Commercial.